Why the Pickens Plan Won’t Work
HIGHLAND, UT | 23 July 2008| One of the hottest topics in the marketplace of ideas is America’s growing concern with energy. Many say that oil production peaked in 2005 and will soon dry up. Others say that petroleum based internal combustion engines, though not very efficient, are here to stay. Many are looking for alternative sources of oil, such as shale or from algae while others argue that these sources are not feasible for the country’s needs. And there is the ubiquitous clamoring that our current “dependence” upon foreign oil is draining our coffers dry. One of the latest to come on the scene for the current crisis of alternative solutions, is a man named T. Boone Pickens.
With a name like T. Boone Pickens: if you picture a Texas oil tycoon millionaire philanthropist, you would be correct. Though his plan is new, Pickens is not new to the energy industry. The son of an oil producer and a degree in geology, no doubt to aid him in understanding where oil, natural gas and other energy sources may be found in the earth, Pickens was the founder of Mesa Petroleum, which grew to become “one of the largest and most well known independent exploration and production companies in the United States” under his stewardship. Simply put, Pickens’ background and experience definitely qualifies him to be listened to regarding an alternative plan.
His plan is to use one of the world’s greatest wind resources to generate enough electricity to power other energy plants and to provide a portion of America’s electricity needs, thus relieving the need to operate these plants with oil, so the oil demand in the country would drop and more oil could also be used to produce fuel for our vehicles. The Plan also provides for alternative sources of automobile fuel, such as natural gas and ultimately electricity. The plan appears quite legitimate, in and of itself. But it contains a serious flaw that will prove it ultimate failure, and perhaps the failure of our great nation.
Principles govern in the affairs of man. A plan that violates those principles may prove quite successful in the short-term, but will ultimately spell the doom of all those involved. In this regard, Pickens doesn’t really appear to violate principle in the plan itself: wind, natural gas, and other sources of energy are as viable as any other on earth. And left up to a good capitalist, say, another Henry Ford or Steve Jobs, these alternatives could definitely become the next hysteria in transportation. The major flaws of the Pickens Plan is the implementation.
Pickens has been in Washington D.C.all this week, lobbying elected officials and testifying before committees, looking for “permission” to carry forth his plan. This corporatist approach to solving this nation’s challenges violates the Principles of Prosperity and will ultimately end in ruins.
Key Points
- Those who seek the protection of government believe government provides prosperity. Those who understand where true prosperity comes from will then gain the faith necessary to act appropriately. Pickens reveals his faith in government rather than God:
It can all be accomplished with private investment but needs government support by clearing the way for action, which means help on providing the transmission right of way, the appropriate renewals of the renewable energy tax credits, among other things.
- In reality, the plan, any plan, only needs one thing from government: to get itself out of the way and allow informed citizens to voluntarily create the solutions the country seeks.
- Faith is the opposite of fear. again, a thorough understanding of God as the true source of prosperity puts the course in perspective and creates a level of certainty. This builds faith which aids an individual to action. Pickens wants to have the government force its citizens to follow his plan. He lacks the faith that people will see this for themselves. If an intended market does not recognize its self-interest in a given market item, the only way to get that intended market to buy into it is by force. The better solution for Pickens would be to create the project more locally and have it prove its legitimacy and allow it to catch on in the rest of the country. To his credit, he is currently building the largest wind farm in the world which will have the productive capability of four coal-fire plants. Perhaps, however, he feels this is too slow.
- By attaching stewardship (the responsibility of failure) to the collective body, the Pickens Plan creates a fissure in agency. No one will act responsibly enough to ensure success. This allows an escape hatch to exist in case of failure. And when it crashes, too many otherwise responsible parties will echo Atlas Shrugs’, “It’s not my fault.” This gets people off the hook but it does not create a formula for success.
Conclusion
The intended implementation process of the Pickens Plan is the product of a collective attitude within the American society that says business success can only happen with government’s blessing. This is the result of decades of fascist and other socialist influence over not just government’s psyche, but that of the general population as well. Thus, the truth of the FreeCapitalist statement: Everyone is trained, taught, and educated in the scarcity paradigm. That psyche is the flame that has fueled our society from the Great Depression right down to the next big bail out and the next government-enforced great idea. On paper, the Pickens Plan looks really good, but these violations of principle will spell the ultimate doom. The Founders created a country in which rugged individualism and social strength, based upon the universal principles of prosperity, would move this country forward in success. Anything short of that, anything that replaces faith with fear, is at best a counterfeit and will not work.
Action Items
- Review the Pickens Plan for yourself and decide whether the energy portion of the plan is something you could support.
- Communicate with your Congressman your position regarding any government involvement in this Plan.
- If you have an idea you’ve contemplated bringing to market, study Principle 1 (God is the author of prosperity) and Principle 2 (Faith begins with self-interest) until you have built enough faith in yourself and in others to bring your idea to market according to principle.
MRFC Principles: 1 (1, 2, 3, 11, 12, 13)
Sources
The Man with the Plan,PickensPlan.com.
The Plan,PickensPlan.com.
T. Boone Pickens’ energy plan gets play in Washington, Dallas Business Journal, July 23, 2008.
C. Rick Koerber, A Call for Revolution,The FreeCapitalist Project Primer, p. 19.
Comment by Darrel Ratliff on 24 July 2008:
The only benefit I can see in Pickens plans is limited stewardship profits and hikes natural gas futures with the inflation on the winter heating season, not to mention the cost of new transmission lines and methods costing more taxes to supliment his personal profit.
Mr pickens would generate more profit by adding to his arsenal of fuels by installing free standing hydrogen generation fueling stands with solar cell tech or wind power to electrolysis providing portable energy that does not need a new national power grid each of these are better solutions to the test and provide for further abundance of resources and generation of value.
Alternate fuel sources for transportation have had a long history most people just dont research it may be a tad brain off when you can go to the books and relearn the conversional use of wood as a gas from fractinal distilatin of wet hardwood to charcoal as was done by taxi cabs during world war 2 taking the flammable gas from fractional distillation of the carbon of the wood producing fuel to drive cars/ trucks etc at the same break neck speeds that gasoline provides.
for an example last gas crunch Mother Earth News has articles showing a prototype of how to run your pickup truck with wood. leaving the natural gas for home heat and other commercial uses like farming drying of grain or generation of electricity providing more profit from available skills.
Comment by Darrel Ratliff on 25 July 2008:
woops missed this important part:$
Sources
http://www.hydrogeneconomy.gc.ca/stories_e.html
http://www.motherearthnews.com/Energy-Matters/Green-Transportation/Truck-Burns-Wood-Chips-For-Fuel.aspx?blogid=1500
MRFC Principles: 3,7,10
Comment by Matthew Pilling on 6 August 2008:
Here’s an interesting take on the Pickens Plan by Glenn Beck. He says:
“Yeah, good ole Texas oil man T. Boone Pickens has a plan for alternative energy too. He’s spending a TON of money to let us know that the country needs to break it’s addiction to oil and switch to wind. Surely that has NOTHING to do with the fact that he’s invested $2 billion to build wind turbines, and is working on hooking up a power grid from the wind farms in West Texas all the way to Dallas. The great thing about wind as opposed to oil is, wind is subsidized by the taxpayer dollars to the tune of $25 per kilowatt hour. In other words, we pay his expenses, HE reaps the profit. There’s more. At Pickens behest, the Texas Legislature changed a law allowing him, through his wife and ranch manager, eminent domain rights over 200,000 acres worth of groundwater rights in Roberts, Texas that could bolster his budget another $1 billion. But it’s all about the planet, right?”
http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/13525/
Comment by Ammon Nelson on 7 August 2008:
It appears to me that Mr. Beck is barking up the wrong tree. Why should it be about the planet? Why is it only a good thing for Mr. Pickens to promote wind energy if he has not invested $2 billion to build wind turbines? What does his investment have to do with the benefits of wind energy? To me it simply shows that he believes in wind energy enough to start something.
Now the whole graft thing that is going on is an entirely different matter, but Mr. Beck misses the point by asking, “But it’s all about the planet, right?” What does the planet have to do with graft?
Comment by Jason K. Vaughn on 8 August 2008:
That didn’t make sense to me either. Just because Mr. Pickens has already invested billions in wind [Ha! I’ll stop there because that sounds so funny. ;)] doesn’t mean he is not allowed to promote the idea. All the more, that is a darn good reason to promote it. I know if I had invested $2 billion in anything I would promote the heck out of it.
Where Pickens goes wrong is in getting the government (ahem…all of us) to cover the risk—the graft. And I was satisfied that Glenn Beck adequately expressed himself in that regard.
Putting the two toegether, I think what Beck was saying is, “Right…it’s all about the planet isn’t it? While you thrust your fascist corporatism upon us and use the emotionalism of saving the planet as a backdrop to coerce everyone into following your plan.”
Truly, whether it saves the planet (the piece of dirt we call earth, without getting too disrespectful) or makes billions of dollars; if it is done in the name of coercion or deception it is still immoral and should not be done.
However, if he wants to find a moral way to do it, more power to him (no pun intended).
Jason